RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility

From: Ranjith Samuel <ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:31:54 +0530

Great. Thanx Jerry!! You're a life saver!!

> Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:48:12 +0800
> From: jerry.du_at_accenture.com
> To: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>
> You should have a convert at V.35 end or G.703 BNC will not able to
> connect to. The connection would like follow:
>
>
>
> A router - E1 interface - G.703 - (Service provider) - G.703 BNC - G.703
> to V.35 converter - V.35 interface - B router
>
> |----------------- A end------------|
> |----------------------------------B
> end---------------------------------|
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jerry
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Ranjith Samuel [mailto:ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 2:31 PM
> To: Du, Jerry; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
>
>
>
> Thanks for your reply Jerry.
>
> So do we need a G.703 <-> V.35 conveter at either end for this circuit
> to work?? Wont G.703 interface talk to V.35 interface without the
> convereter?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ranjith Samuel
>
> > Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:10:41 +0800
> > From: jerry.du_at_accenture.com
> > To: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> >
> > Hi Ranjith,
> >
> > Yes, G.703 interface is able to work with v.35 in another end. The
> > problem you meet would be something wrong in V.35 converter, I guess.
> >
> > Unframed setting in v.35 converter should be correct, but there are
> > should some other switches in converter. You may check with your ISP
> for
> > the v.35 converter setting.
> >
> > There are no special setting in router end, you would treat it as a
> > normal link and apply the configuration what it should be.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jerry
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > Ranjith Samuel
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 1:57 PM
> > To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > Subject: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> >
> > Dear Experts,
> >
> >
> >
> > I've a query that I am sure that you will be able to help me out with.
> >
> >
> >
> > I have a leased line between my two of my offices each side served by
> a
> > different Service Provider with an interconnect between them. I have
> > explained
> > the setup Below
> >
> >
> >
> > Point A :
> >
> >
> >
> > L2 Protocol : HDLC
> >
> > Interface Type : E1 Controller G.703
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Point B :
> >
> >
> >
> > L2 Protocol : HDLC
> >
> > Interface Type : E1 Controller V.35
> >
> >
> >
> > The issue is I cat get both sides to comunicate. I have tried the
> > following
> > combintations in terms of framing
> >
> >
> >
> > 1) Unframed
> >
> > 2) 1-31 Time slots
> >
> >
> >
> > I also tried generating a network loop from the E1 Controller @ point
> A
> > and
> > this is seen by the remote router. End to End testing has been done on
> > the
> > circuit and there are no errors.
> >
> >
> >
> > The Symptom is that the Serial Interface comes up but line protocol is
> > down. I
> > tried all corrective action on the cisco website.
> >
> >
> >
> > I would also like to mention that when the service provider plus in
> his
> > router
> > with a G.703 interface in point B, the circuit comes up with a
> > channelised
> > E1.
> >
> >
> >
> > Can someone tell if both interfaces has to be of the same type for it
> to
> > talk
> > , or can G.703 talk to V.35 ?
> >
> >
> >
> > I would reallyy appreciate it if anyone can give me a lead or clue as
> to
> > what
> > I might be doing wrong.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Ranjith Samuel.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > How fun is this? IMing with Windows Live Messenger just got better.
> > http://www.microsoft.com/india/windows/windowslive/messenger.aspx
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
> privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have
> received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
> the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ________________________________
>
> Twice the fun- Share photos while you chat with Windows Live Messenger.
> <http://www.microsoft.com/india/windows/windowslive/messenger.aspx>
>
>
>
> This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged,
> proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in
> error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any
> other use of the email by you is prohibited.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tue Apr 07 2009 - 12:31:54 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:11 ART