Hi Vijay
[[ETHSW SW1]]
1 = access 101
You have to configure vlan 101 on the breakout switch. As per the example R1
f0/0 goes to access port vlan 101. So let's assume you configure port f0/24
on the breakout switch as an access port belonging to vlan 101. This will be
considered as a port belonging to R1.
Now from f0/24 on the breakout switch, connect to the real switch port (3550
or 3560) as per the physical topology.
*I have one more doubt, if we configure the breakout switch port to an
access port (vlan 101) it means that we have to configure the same vlan on
the real switch port correct?*
By real switch, I assume you mean the 3550 or 3650. You configure vlans on
it as per your logical topology. You dont need configure vlans on the
breakout switch again on those switches.
I am not so sure whether router on stick is possible through this method.
The best thing is to try it out. Given the option, I would always go for
quad NICs. Have you also thought about using USB NICs?
HTH
Lejoe
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Vijay Karanth <vijay.karanth_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> Thank you, Lejoe.
>
> I have one more doubt, if we configure the breakout switch port to an
> access port (vlan 101) it means that we have to configure the same vlan on
> the real switch port correct? i think we will not be able to configure to
> any other vlans on the real swicthes.
>
> And I doubt that we cannot do router on stick configuration on this set-up,
> please let me know your thoughts on this.
>
> Regards,
> Vijay Karanth
>
>
> 2009/4/5 Lejoe <styran_at_gmail.com>
>
> Hi Vijay
>>
>> [[ETHSW SW1]]
>> 1 = access 101
>> 2 = access 102
>> 3 = access 103
>> 4 = access 104
>> 5 = access 105
>> 6 = access 106
>> 7 = access 201
>> 8 = access 202
>> 9 = access 203
>> 10 = access 204
>> 11 = access 205
>> 12 = access 206
>> 13 = access 224
>> 14 = access 124
>> 15 = dot1q 1 NIO_gen_eth:eth1
>>
>>
>> On the breakout switch, you need to create around 14 vlans (101, 102, 124
>> etc) in this case . Assign a port on the breakout switch to each of those
>> vlans (access ports). Connect those ports to the real switch, as per your
>> physical topology.
>>
>> eg : R1's F0/0 goes to SW1 1, which is an access port in vlan 101. Create
>> vlan 101 on the breakout switch. Assign a port on the switch to vlan 101
>> (access port). Connect that port to the real switch.
>>
>> HTH
>>
>> Lejoe
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Vijay Karanth <vijay.karanth_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thank you all for the response.
>> >
>> > I have one doubt with this set-up:
>> >
>> > [[ETHSW SW1]]
>> > 1 = access 101
>> > 15 = dot1q 1 NIO_gen_eth:eth1
>> >
>> > Breakout switch connecting to the server running dynamips with a 802.1q
>> > trunk carrying all the uplinks (about 13 vlans) (one physical link) but
>> not
>> > sure what should be port configuration on the breakout switch connecting
>> the
>> > real switches.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Vijay Karanth
>> >
>> >
>> > 2009/4/4 Kelly <kelly_at_cliffhanger.com>
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Here's a good start for you.
>> > >
>> > > This is how a friend of mine did it and,
>> > > it worked well for him.
>> > >
>> > > http://www.internetworkpro.org/wiki/Dynamips_w/_real_switches
>> > >
>> > > kelly
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Quoting Anbu <ksanpu_at_gmail.com>:
>> > > Hi
>> > > is there any way to connect our dynamips routers with real
>> > > Switches (
>> > > 3550 /3560) with only one NIC card in the Laptop ?
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Nanthee
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:57 PM, rakesh m <raaki.88_at_gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Vijay Karanth <
>> > > vijay.karanth_at_gmail.com
>> > > > >wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I'm using Dynamips (version 0.2.8-RC2-x86) on Fedora 10 for
>> > > practising
>> > > > R&S
>> > > > > lab, I'm facing couple of issue with it, hoping some one
>> might
>> > > have a
>> > > > > solution for it. The main issue which I'm facing (as you
>> might
>> > > all know
>> > > > > that
>> > > > > we cannot emulate switches on Dynamips) by not emulating
>> the
>> > > switches.
>> > > > > Because of this I'm unable to practice (ISL, PAGP/LACP,
>> layer 3
>> > > > > port-channels, dot1q-tunnelling, l2tunnleing,
>> Private-VLANs,
>> > > etc...).
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Please let me know if some has a alternative solution for
>> this
>> > > issue, I'm
>> > > > > wondering if there is a way that we can connect a physical
>> > > switch to the
>> > > > > Dynamips router? Any information on this are helpful.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regards,
>> > > > > Vijay Karanth
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> > > > > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > there is no other emulator / simulator alternative from
>> dynamips
>> > > or gns3
>> > > > sadly . the only thing you could do is to have a couple of
>> 3550 or
>> > > 3560 and
>> > > > attach it to your pc and emulate router along with physcial
>> switch
>> > > .. this
>> > > > has been the alternative for many ..
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> > > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Apr 05 2009 - 23:13:01 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:11 ART