(no subject)

Yes, but that would summarize the network to its classful boundary i.e
163.1.0.0/16.

So Yuri, if the requirement is only to summarize the network to its
classful boundary, auto-summarize it i.e remove no auto-summary. But
if, as per your scenario above you want it to summarize it to some
other subnet, then Divin's solution holds good

Ravi

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:35 PM, David Raney <daraneygs_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> You would not need the distribute-list per the requirements when using
> 'auto-summary' and BB2 should get the summary routes
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Cisco Fanatic <ebay_products_at_hotmail.com>wrote:
>
>> No routes to BB2 after removing "no auto-summary" command under the RIP
>> process.
>>
>> !
>> router rip
>> version 2
>> passive-interface default
>> no passive-interface Serial0/1
>> no passive-interface Ethernet1/0
>> network 163.1.0.0
>> network 192.10.1.0
>> distribute-list prefix RIP_SUMMARY out Ethernet1/0
>> !
>> ip prefix-list RIP_SUMMARY seq 5 permit 163.1.0.0/18
>> !
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Apr 02 2009 - 15:52:35 ART