Re: Simple Q on Static Route

Refer to
http://www.dide3d.com/2009/04/perils-of-ip-route-xxxx-25525500-nexthopip-work-around/
Thanking You

Yours Sincerely

Divin Mathew John
divinjohn_at_gmail.com
divin_at_dide3d.com
+91 9945430983
+91 9846697191
+974 5008916
PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK @ http://www.dide3d.com/divin_Public_PGP_key.txt
Sent from Bangalore, KA, India

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Kelvin Yeo <kelvinyeo24_at_yahoo.com.sg> wrote:

> Does the in-availabilities (unreachable) of a static route 'next-hop'
> removed itself from the routing table?
>
>
>
> I was exploring using static route as an alternative of IP SLA for
> conditional routing, but apparently it fails :-). Static route is still
> installed after the next hop is 'shut'.
>
>
>
> Just wanted to verify static route behavior.
>
>
>
> Rdgs,
>
> Kelvin
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Apr 02 2009 - 00:05:53 ART