From: Taufik Kurniawan (ktaufik@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Mar 29 2009 - 10:17:19 ART
I think it is not legal.
Why don't he just quit X and join Y ?
cheers,
taufik
On 29/03/2009, Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry to bring this topic back again but one of my friend who asked me this
> question a few days ago.
> Can someone shed some light in his case?
>
> My friend works for company X. Company X is Cisco Gold partner but they
> don't use his R&S ccie. His company already have about 8 CCIE's. His CCIE
> (R&S) number is free and not associated with anyone at the moment.
>
> The question is can he be a part time employee for the company Y and
> associate his number with them while working for company X? Fulltime for
> company X and part time for company Y ?
>
> Company Y wants their gold partnership. And he tells me that the company Y
> will also be giving him occasionally part time critical calls to solve.
>
>
> I don't see any ethical issue(s) in the above case. He can associate his
> number with company Y and get some benefits of his number.
>
> -frog
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 2:04 PM, Darby Weaver <darbyweaver@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Simple contact Cisco and request a new CCO number.
> >
> > If not, take a cisco exam with a different CCO and ask
> > to consolidate with the new CCO account.
> >
> >
> > --- Duane Dewitt <Duane.Dewitt@za.verizonbusiness.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > All that the partner needs is his CSCO number to use
> > > it for
> > > certification applications. His CCO doesn't even
> > > need to be associated
> > > with the company as far as I know. At least that is
> > > how it worked for
> > > the normal certs, maybe CCIE is different.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Duane
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > Jai Prakash
> > > Sent: 10 September 2006 07:06 PM
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: OT : Regarding CCIE NO Association with
> > > Company
> > >
> > > Hi Groups,
> > >
> > > First of all, greetings to all of you and very
> > > sorry for this off
> > > topic.
> > >
> > > My friend removed his *CCO ID* association from
> > > his current company
> > > and he is going to appear for CCIE Lab exam.
> > >
> > > I would like to know about can administrator of
> > > his company join his
> > > * CCO ID* again without his permission or without
> > >
> > > using his CCO ID. He don't want to associate his
> > > *CCO ID* with his
> > > current company. If he pass the CCIE Lab, he will
> > > continue
> > >
> > > with his current company for some time (6
> > > months) as per commitment.
> > > After that, he has plan to leave the the company.
> > >
> > > At the time of leaving the current company, he
> > > want his *CCIE NO* to
> > > be free , so that he can use his *CCIE NO* with his
> > > new
> > >
> > > company. Is there any way that administrator of
> > > the current company
> > > can associate his *CCO ID* without his knowledge?
> > >
> > > He is using his company e-mail id in his *CCO
> > > ID*. Actully, he wants
> > > to join us.
> > >
> > > Any help would appreciated .
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot in adv.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > Jai
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:08 ART