Re: OT:Dumps are already out for open-ended questions!!

From: Roy Waterman (roy.waterman@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Mar 29 2009 - 03:40:25 ART

Next message: Divin Mathew John: "Re: very interesting NAT scenario, any idea?"
Previous message: Radioactive Frog: "Re: OT : Regarding CCIE NO Association with Company"
Maybe in reply to: Andy Hogard: "OT:Dumps are already out for open-ended questions!!"
Next in thread: Radioactive Frog: "Re: OT:Dumps are already out for open-ended questions!!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I just think of the amount of time wasted in pointless discussions which
really dont go anywhere being better served actually studying towards the
CCIE :)
It actually scares me how much time people have to engage in such :)
Maybe I need to improve my time management!

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Darby Weaver <ccie.weaver@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Andy - You win dude... I'm out.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- Regards Roy

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

Next message: Divin Mathew John: "Re: very interesting NAT scenario, any idea?"
Previous message: Radioactive Frog: "Re: OT : Regarding CCIE NO Association with Company"
Maybe in reply to: Andy Hogard: "OT:Dumps are already out for open-ended questions!!"
Next in thread: Radioactive Frog: "Re: OT:Dumps are already out for open-ended questions!!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:08 ART