From: Ovidiu Neghina (o.neghina@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Mar 22 2009 - 00:49:31 ART
if it is not on blueprint is not in the exam.
if they announce the new blueprint we still have 6 month to use the old print.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Antonio Soares <amsoares@netcabo.pt> wrote:
> I don't think we have IPv6 yet but most likely we will have it in the next blueprint revision.
>
> But Rick Mur who attended the CCIE SP Techtorial says that IPv6 is already there:
>
> http://rickmur.com/2009/01/26/networkers-09-ccie-sp-techtorial
>
> It would be nice to have a clarification.
>
> Regards,
>
> Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S)
> amsoares@netcabo.pt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Ovidiu Neghina
> Sent: sabado, 21 de Margo de 2009 15:38
> To: Antonio Soares
> Cc: Joseph L. Brunner; ccielab@groupstudy.com; comserv@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: IPv6 route leaking
>
> hi
> off topic : do we have IPv6 on CCIE SP ? the blueprint says nothing about IPv6 or 6VPE
>
> ovidiu
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Antonio Soares <amsoares@netcabo.pt> wrote:
>> The configuration i have works perfectly for IPv4. But the same type of config does not work for IPv6.
>>
>> And the problem is this static route:
>>
>> ipv6 route 2001:3::/64 FastEthernet0/1.1 nexthop-vrf vrf1
>>
>> The router installs it but for some reason it does not work.
>>
>> I have these configurations if someone wants to give it a try:
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>> R1:
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>> !
>> ip cef
>> ipv6 unicast-routing
>> ipv6 cef
>> !
>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>> ip address 12.12.12.1 255.255.255.0
>> ipv6 address 2001:12::1/64
>> !
>> interface FastEthernet0/1
>> ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
>> ipv6 address 2001:1::1/64
>> !
>> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 12.12.12.2
>> !
>> ipv6 route ::/0 2001:12::2
>> !
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>> R2
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>> !
>> vrf definition vrf1
>> rd 1:1
>> !
>> address-family ipv4
>> route-target export 1:1
>> route-target import 1:1
>> exit-address-family
>> !
>> address-family ipv6
>> route-target export 1:1
>> route-target import 1:1
>> exit-address-family
>> !
>> ip cef
>> ipv6 unicast-routing
>> ipv6 cef
>> !
>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>> ip address 12.12.12.2 255.255.255.0
>> ipv6 address 2001:12::2/64
>> !
>> interface FastEthernet0/1
>> vrf forwarding vrf1
>> ip address 20.20.20.1 255.255.255.0
>> ipv6 address 2001:2::1/64
>> !
>> ip route 20.20.20.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/1 ip route vrf vrf1
>> 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 12.12.12.1 global !
>> ipv6 route 2001:2::/64 FastEthernet0/1 nexthop-vrf vrf1
>> ipv6 route vrf vrf1 ::/0 2001:12::1 nexthop-vrf default !
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> You will need 12.4(20)T or higher in order to have support for IPv6 VRFs.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S)
>> amsoares@netcabo.pt
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>> Of Joseph L. Brunner
>> Sent: quinta-feira, 19 de Margo de 2009 15:14
>> To: 'Antonio Soares'; ccielab@groupstudy.com; comserv@groupstudy.com
>> Subject: RE: IPv6 route leaking
>>
>> Your forgetting the resolution will fail because of the medium- Ethernet...
>>
>> Solve this with "pumpkin loopbacks" or whatever the hell its called...
>>
>> Simply run a gre tunnel between two tunnel interfaces in the same
>> router, each sourced from different loopback. Both loopbacks part of global routing table; on tunnel interface part of VRF routing
> table.
>>
>> Works every time!
>>
>> -Joe
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>> Of Antonio Soares
>> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 12:10 PM
>> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; comserv@groupstudy.com
>> Subject: IPv6 route leaking
>>
>> Hello group,
>>
>> Suppose these interfaces:
>>
>> !
>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>> ip address 123.123.123.3 255.255.255.0
>> ipv6 address 2001:13::3/64
>> !
>> interface FastEthernet0/1.1
>> vrf forwarding vrf1
>> encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
>> ip address 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.0
>> ipv6 address 2001:3::1/64
>> !
>>
>> For IPv4, we have these options to do route leaking:
>>
>> 1) Global RT to VRF:
>>
>> ip route 100.100.100.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/1.1
>>
>> 2) VRF to Global RT:
>>
>> ip route vrf vrf1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 123.123.123.1 global
>>
>>
>> I was trying to accomplish the same with IPv6:
>>
>> 1) Global RT to VRF:
>>
>> ipv6 route 2001:3::/64 FastEthernet0/1.1 nexthop-vrf vrf1
>>
>> 2) VRF to Global RT:
>>
>> ipv6 route vrf vrf1 ::/0 2001:13::1 nexthop-vrf Default
>>
>> But here Global RT to VRF does not work.
>>
>>
>> Local router:
>>
>> ping vrf vrf1 2001:1::1
>>
>> ICMPv6: Sent echo request, Src=2001:3::1, Dst=2001:1::1
>> ICMPv6: Sent Unreachable code 3, Src=2001:13::3, Dst=2001:1::1
>>
>> Remote router:
>>
>> ICMPv6: Received echo request, Src=2001:3::1, Dst=2001:1::1
>> ICMPv6: Sent echo reply, Src=2001:1::1, Dst=2001:3::1
>> ICMPv6: Received Unreachable code 3, Src=2001:13::3, Dst=2001:1::1
>>
>>
>> Ant hints ? Is this supported ?
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S)
>> amsoares@netcabo.pt
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> _ Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/comserv.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> _ Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/comserv.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:06 ART