From: Pavel Bykov (slidersv@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Mar 17 2009 - 18:58:25 ART
The thing to consider is that fall back bridging should bridge only non-IP
traffic.
Otherwise this is more normal than not.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:58 PM, <joe_astorino@comcast.net> wrote:
> I have 2 switches trunked together in this lab scenario. The scenario
> instructs me to do fallback bridging for VLANs 999 and 1000. On SW 1 I
> configured an SVI for each vlan, and configured the fallback bridging. On
> the first switch, I now continually get the below output: Note, the switches
> are linked via po12 port-channel. My first thought is that this is
> absolutely normal because the VLANs are bridged, but I wanted to make sure.
> It definitely is an annoyance when trying to finish the rest of the lab (I
> always turn on "logging con deb" so I can see everything necessary in the
> lab)
>
>
> 6d16h: %SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: Host 000b.46e2.6997 in bridge group 1 is
> flapping between port Po12 (Vl1000) and port Po12 (Vl999)
> Cat1#
> 6d16h: %SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: Host 000b.46e2.6997 in bridge group 1 is
> flapping between port Po12 (Vl999) and port Po12 (Vl1000)
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Pavel Bykov ---------------- Don't forget to help stopping the braindumps, use of which reduces value of your certifications. Sign the petition at http://www.stopbraindumps.com/Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:05 ART