Re: Policy routing help

From: Sadiq Yakasai (sadiqtanko@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 16 2009 - 17:25:27 ART

I think it should be. But since you don't have any action assigned to that
policy line, it should then be routed according to the routing table of the
router. Right?

Sadiq

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Mike M <mike_malan@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi everyone
>
> I need your help understanding a part of the Policy routing operation.
>
> My example is below:
>
> interface Vlan40
> ip address 192.168.90.253 255.255.255.0 secondary
> ip address 192.1.80.253 255.255.255.0
> ip policy route-map split-access
>
> route-map split-access permit 11
> match ip address 111
> !
> route-map split-access permit 21
> match ip address 121
> set ip next-hop 10.3.0.254
> !
> route-map split-access permit 25
> match ip address 125
> set ip next-hop 10.3.0.254
> !
> route-map split-access permit 31
>
>
> access-list 111 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
> log-input
> access-list 111 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.1.0.0 0.0.255.255
> log-input
> access-list 111 permit ip any 10.7.0.0 0.0.0.255 log-input
> access-list 111 permit ip any 10.6.0.0 0.0.0.255 log-input
> access-list 111 permit ip any 10.65.0.0 0.0.0.255
>
> access-list 121 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 any log-input
>
> access-list 125 permit ip 192.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 10.5.0.0 0.0.0.255
> log-input
>
> Will access-list 111 be included in the policy routing decision, it does
> not have the "set ip next-hop" command in the route map config.
>
> route-map split-access permit 11
> match ip address 111
>
> Thanks for your help
> Mike
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 

-- 
CCIE #19963

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:05 ART