Re: Regarding FR FREEK

From: libone mhlanga (libone@lycos.com)
Date: Thu Mar 12 2009 - 08:24:20 ARST


Was just about to say FREEK = Frame Relay End to End Keepalive
...confirmed now :)

---------[ Received Mail Content ]----------

Subject : Re: Regarding FR FREEK

Date : Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:46:34 -0700

From : Raghav Bhargava <raghavbhargava12@gmail.com>

To : Pavel Bykov <slidersv@gmail.com>

Cc : Cisco certification <ccielab@groupstudy.com>

hey em sorry all.I actually fixed it myself....:)

So basically it needs to be applied on both sides simultaneously coz

otherwise the keepalive will die after 2 events which is default for
FREEK.

thanks for all the support..

raghav

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Pavel Bykov wrote:

> Did you apply the same config on R1 as well?

> Including: map-class frame-relay TST12

> frame-relay end-to-end keepalive mode bidirectional

>

> ?

>

> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Raghav Bhargava <

> raghavbhargava12@gmail.com> wrote:

>

>> Hi Experts,

>>

>> I enabled end-to-end keepalives on my 2 routers using FR . Also I

>> configured

>> the keepalive in bidirectional mode . As soon as I configure the class
on

>> the sub-interface my PVC goes down giving me this error message

>>

>> "r1(config)#map-class frame-relay TST

>> *Mar 1 10:19:03.027: %FR_EEK-5-FAILED: Interface Serial0/0.12 - DLCI
102

>> "

>>

>> Configuration on R1

>>

>> interface Serial0/0

>> no ip address

>> encapsulation frame-relay

>> frame-relay lmi-type cisco

>> !

>> interface Serial0/0.12 point-to-point

>> ip address 150.1.12.1 255.255.255.0

>> frame-relay interface-dlci 102

>> class TST12

>> !

>> map-class frame-relay TST12

>> frame-relay end-to-end keepalive mode bidirectional

>>

>>

>> *****************************

>>

>> The weird part is my sub-interface on the other side i.e--R2 remains
up

>> while the sub-interface on R1 goes down

>>

>> r1#sh ip int brief

>> Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status

>> Protocol

>> FastEthernet0/0 unassigned YES unset administratively

>> down

>> down

>> Serial0/0 unassigned YES unset up

>> up

>> *Serial0/0.12 150.1.12.1 YES manual down

>> down*

>> Serial0/0.13 150.1.13.1 YES manual up

>> up

>> Serial0/0.14 150.1.14.1 YES manual up

>> up

>> FastEthernet0/1 unassigned YES unset administratively

>> down

>> down

>> Serial0/1 unassigned YES unset administratively

>> down

>> down

>>

>>

>>

>> *****************************

>>

>> r1#sh frame-relay map

>> Serial0/0.13 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 103(0x67,0x1870),
broadcast

>> status defined, active

>> *Serial0/0.12 (down): point-to-point dlci, dlci 102(0x66,0x1860),

>> broadcast

>> status defined, inactive*

>> Serial0/0.14 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 104(0x68,0x1880),
broadcast

>> status defined, active

>>

>>

>> **************************************

>> r2#sh ip int brief

>> Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status

>> Protocol

>> FastEthernet0/0 unassigned YES unset administratively

>> down

>> down

>> Serial0/0 unassigned YES unset up

>> up

>> *Serial0/0.12 150.1.12.2 YES manual up

>> up

>> *

>> ******************************************

>>

>> r2#sh fram ma

>> *Serial0/0.12 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 201(0xC9,0x3090),
broadcast

>> status defined, active

>> *

>>

>>

>> kindly advise what could be the issue ???

>>

>>

>>

>> --

>> Warm Regards

>> Raghav

>>

>>

>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

>>

>>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:04 ART