From: Scott Morris (smorris@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sun Mar 08 2009 - 11:10:47 ARST
They're different addresses. One is a 69 subnet, the other is 96 subnet.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Modular
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 3:18 AM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Multilink interfaces with the same IP address
While working some practice labs Ive run into some scenarios where the
proctor guides provide solutions where two MFR interfaces or two regular
multilink interfaces are set up on a router with the same IP address. How is
this possible??
R6
interface MFR1
no ip address
no keepalive
!
interface MFR1.69 point-to-point
ip address 150.100.69.6 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 690
!
interface MFR1.96 point-to-point
ip address 150.100.96.6 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 960
!
interface Serial0/2/0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay MFR1
clock rate 2000000
no arp frame-relay
!
interface Serial0/2/1
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay MFR1
clock rate 2000000
no arp frame-relay
R9
interface MFR1
no ip address
no keepalive
!
interface MFR1.69 point-to-point
ip address 150.100.69.9 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 690
!
interface MFR1.96 point-to-point
ip address 150.100.96.9 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 960
!
interface Serial0/2/0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay MFR1
no arp frame-relay
!
interface Serial0/2/1
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay MFR1
no arp frame-relay
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:04 ART