From: L Pham (ccie17030@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 24 2009 - 21:48:19 ARST
Scott, are you talking about MY telco dept. ??? ;-)))
Loc
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:03 PM, swm@emanon.com <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> And some just WILL NOT give it up. :)
>
> ---- Message from Marko Milivojevic <markom@markom.info> at 2009-02-24
> 00:19:39 ------
>>On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 17:43, Alex H. Ryu <r.hyunseog@ieee.org> wrote:
>>> Do we have Cell-mode MPLS in production in any where?
>>> I saw cell-mode MPLS was supported from Cisco BPX/MGX.
>>> But if you plan to use it with router platform, you have to use
>>> frame-mode MPLS.
>>>
>>> So I thought cell-mode MPLS was not advanced to production at all.
>>
>>I'm glad you asked this.
>>
>>If by "in-production" you consider one connection when I was bored and
>>boss wasn't looking, then, yeah, there is at least one out there ;-)
>>
>>> The reason of deploying MPLS is to get rid of ATM or other underlying
>>> mechanism.
>>
>>However, you would be surprised if you knew how much telcos still love
>>their ATM.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:12 ARST