From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Wed Feb 25 2009 - 00:08:04 ARST
heheeh... Sounds like I might be! :)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of L
Pham
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 6:48 PM
To: swm@emanon.com
Cc: Marko Milivojevic; Alex H. Ryu; ALL From_NJ; Service Provider; Cisco
certification; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Cell Mode MPLS+LDP
Scott, are you talking about MY telco dept. ??? ;-)))
Loc
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:03 PM, swm@emanon.com <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> And some just WILL NOT give it up. :)
>
> ---- Message from Marko Milivojevic <markom@markom.info> at 2009-02-24
> 00:19:39 ------
>>On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 17:43, Alex H. Ryu <r.hyunseog@ieee.org> wrote:
>>> Do we have Cell-mode MPLS in production in any where?
>>> I saw cell-mode MPLS was supported from Cisco BPX/MGX.
>>> But if you plan to use it with router platform, you have to use
>>> frame-mode MPLS.
>>>
>>> So I thought cell-mode MPLS was not advanced to production at all.
>>
>>I'm glad you asked this.
>>
>>If by "in-production" you consider one connection when I was bored and
>>boss wasn't looking, then, yeah, there is at least one out there ;-)
>>
>>> The reason of deploying MPLS is to get rid of ATM or other underlying
>>> mechanism.
>>
>>However, you would be surprised if you knew how much telcos still love
>>their ATM.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:12 ARST