From: Thameem Maranveetil Parambath (tparamba@thecontactcentre.ae)
Date: Sun Feb 22 2009 - 01:12:34 ARST
donating $1400 + expenses to Cisco.
Narbik,
I think cisco will only get $1400 from this donation ;)
Regards,
Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>
Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
22/02/2009 05:48 AM
Please respond to
Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>
To
ron.wilkerson@gmail.com
cc
Jason Morris <mcnever@gmail.com>, Cisco certification
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject
Re: OSPF Authentication
The best way to tackle the wording game is to know most of your options.
If
you don't know most of your options, then, how would you know what to do?
The last thing you want to do is to memorize or say to your self when i
hear
this word, i will configure that.
I see a lot of students that are into this word game, and deep down i know
that most if not all will be donating $1400 + expenses to Cisco.
I am glad that you are trying to learn all possible options.
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 5:03 PM, <ron.wilkerson@gmail.com> wrote:
> Be careful on the wording in the lab is all I can say.
>
> They'll give you hints as to which one to use. If they don't care,
you'll
> won't see that kind of language.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Morris <mcnever@gmail.com>
>
> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:43:53
> To: <ron.wilkerson@gmail.com>
> Cc: Cisco certification<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Re: OSPF Authentication
>
>
> my question more revolves around grading what you would consider
correct.
>
> if the question says 'configure authentication for area x', would you
> consider configuring authentication under all the interfaces in that
area
> as
> meeting the requirements for the question? ie not using the 'area x
auth'
> command under the routing process.
>
> is there a show command that will show required authentication for an
area
> vs using the 'sho ip os int' and seeing the authentication configured
for
> each interface?
>
> i ask because normally i wouldnt even think about it in the lab, i'd
> consider it the same thing... it would never accure to me to ask the
> proctor
> if he/she had a preferance...
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:02 PM, <ron.wilkerson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You're half right.
> >
> > 2 ways to authenticate in ospf. You have the 1st way with your
example,
> > configuring under the interface. The second method is to enable it
under
> > the routing process. If you enable authentication in the routing
> process,
> > then all interfaces for that area should be configured with a key or
> > password.
> >
> > Just depends where you want to enable authentication, in the routing
> > process or the interface. Either way, you have to configure the key
> under
> > the interface.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Morris <mcnever@gmail.com>
> >
> > Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:27:32
> > To: Cisco certification<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Subject: OSPF Authentication
> >
> >
> > I have what could be a question of opinion.
> >
> > if a lab requires you to use authentication in an OSPF area, and you
> > configure authentication on all the links in that area and they are
using
> > authentications but you don't issue the 'area x authentication'
command
> > under the routing process, (assuming you've done it on the inter)
would
> you
> > say thats correct?
> >
> > I'm saying that OSPF doesnt authenticated areas it authenticates links
> and
> > the area x authentication command just tells the router all links in
that
> > area should use authentication... right?
> >
> > thoughts?
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:12 ARST