From: Joe Astorino (joe_astorino@comcast.net)
Date: Fri Feb 06 2009 - 06:15:20 ARST
Hi Steve,
As somebody pointed out, I don't belive you can do dot1q tagging on a layer
3 port. Once you make it L3 by doing "no switchport" STP is not going to be
running on it either...because it is basically a router port.
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) - WinPT 1.2.0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=8HMA
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
support@ccie.com.au
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 2:41 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: HUGE STP VLAN problem
Hello people,
Ive been in a cold datacenter for the past 12hrs trying to resolve a problem
with our cat6509-e. the problem is very intersting and i have never seen
anything like it before. i have tryed everything that i know but still no
luck, so i resort to you guys for some help.
the problem is:
when trying to create a routed port "no switcport" then a sub-interface "int
g2/5.207" its all O.K, untill i enter the command encapsulation dot1q.207" i
get the error message "vlan 207 does not available" .... O.K fine, when i go
to create the vlan by entering conft# vlan 207 then name it then exit, it
says "VLAN(s) not available in Port Manager" !!
so ive tryed changing the internal vlan usage allocation policy and reload
but still the same thing !! ive tryed just about anything but no luck.. its
b een 12 hrs now and i give up..
the "sh spantree" command says "No spanning tree instance exists." !!!
then when i do sh vlan i can see the vlan 207 is there and its active !!
what da !! ???
any suggestions: ???? anyone seen this before on a cat6509 running
12.2(18)SXF7 avanced_ip_services ..??
ive searched all of cisco site and only found this(which did not help)
http://supportwiki.cisco.com/ViewWiki/index.php/The_Cisco_Catalyst_6000/6500
_Series_switch_receives_the_VLAN(s)_not_available_in_Port_Manager_error_mess
age_when_it_attempts_to_create_a_VLAN
steve
thanks
Steve K
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:10 ARST