From: Andy Hogard (andyhogard@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 03 2009 - 09:09:02 ARST
You need to be more specific, trust me I just went like wOOT!! If you are
talking about the next hop self command of bgp ..I aint sure that you have
understood what is meant for.
Anyways, will be glad to help ..if you word it in a more correct manner.
Regards,
Andy
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Raghav Bhargava
<raghavbhargava12@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi Experts,
>
> Following is the topology:-
>
>
> ISP----------p2p link-----------------------R1----------R2-------------R3
>
>
> R1,R2,R3 are in the same AS.Lets say 100. Now since we don't advertise
> the point to point link on R1 ( as per the best practices coz
> otherwise the complete internet routes will be in the routing table of
> R1 hence causing CPU hike) we will configure next hop self on R1 so
> that the routers r2 and r3 knows how to go out.
>
> My question is can we do something like this--
>
> make the interface which is connecting ISP as passive and advertise
> the point-to-point link in lets say ospf towards R2 and R3. After
> that remove the next hop self from R1.
>
> Will this thing work..
>
> Why I am asking this is because I don wanna use Next hop self...Just a
> weird question..trying to play and learn at the same time.
> --
> Warm Regards
> Raghav
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- My Blog URL: http://ccieno.blogspot.com/Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:09 ARST