Re: Using CAR with Access-list differences

From: Narbik Kocharians (narbikk@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Jan 24 2009 - 18:01:03 ARST

• Next message: EngBatt: "CCIE R&S Bootcamps"
• Previous message: Pavel Bykov: "Re: OT: literature that breaks down switching, ports per"
• Maybe in reply to: Han Solo: "Using CAR with Access-list differences"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Looks good to me, but with rate-limit access-list, you are using less
commands or i should say minimum number of commands.

On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Han Solo <emaillists@me.com> wrote:

> Is there any difference between the following:
>
>
> 1) Limit the rate of packets from R1 that have ip prec of 1 , 2 , 4 to 256
> Kbps
>
> access-list rate-limit 1 mask 16
>
> vs
>
> access-list 120 permit ip any any precedence priority
> access-list 120 permit ip any any precedence immediate
> access-list 120 permit ip any any precedence flash-override
>
> so now in car you match either acl
>
> Han Solo
> May the force be with you
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Narbik Kocharians
CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
www.MicronicsTraining.com
www.Net-Workbooks.com
Sr. Technical Instructor
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

• Next message: EngBatt: "CCIE R&S Bootcamps"
• Previous message: Pavel Bykov: "Re: OT: literature that breaks down switching, ports per"
• Maybe in reply to: Han Solo: "Using CAR with Access-list differences"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:40 ARST