From: Darby Weaver (ccie.weaver@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 19 2009 - 20:03:09 ARST
Unless you are a CCNA with a lot influence with a lot of CCIE's and those
aspiring to be.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Scott Morris <
smorris@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
> Tell ya what... I'll get a shirt printed up with ALL of the new logos that
> I would be allowed to use, and wear it to a Cisco function just to see how
> many people tell me what a dork I look like. Then I'll change into a shirt
> with the "old" logo on there and see what the reaction happens to be.
>
> Some people may still tell me I'm a dork and I'm ok with that... but it
> won't be nearly as many.
>
> And to vote, one should obtain the certification. No sense in having a
> CCNA tell me what's good for the CCIE program, is there?
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nortic @hackermail.com [mailto:nortic@hackermail.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 4:49 AM
> To: Groupstudy @ CrespoNetworks; Scott Morris
> Cc: 'Marko Milivojevic'; swm@emanon.com; 'Scott M Vermillion'; 'Yandy
> Ramirez'; 'Andrew Larkins'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: New CCIE logo
>
> The old one looks like it was designed almost 20 years ago, ooh wait, it
> was! The new logo's look much better and the "CCNP - Service Provider" move
> is a good one. It shows Cisco is serious about branding their
> certifications. That said some bad moves have been made as well e.g the CCDE
> number format, after that the CCDE dropped from a 9/10 to a 4/10 on my
> awesometer.
>
> For every petition to keep the old logo there will be a petition to keep
> the new ones. I am glad the new logo designs favor multiple IE's as I prefer
> to have a logo for each CCIE than to have one for all.
>
> Is change really that hard?
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Groupstudy @ CrespoNetworks" <groupstudy@cresponet.com>
> > To: "Scott Morris" <smorris@internetworkexpert.com>
> > Cc: "'Marko Milivojevic'" <markom@markom.info>, swm@emanon.com, "'Scott
> M Vermillion'" <scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com>, "'Yandy Ramirez'" <
> yandyr@gmail.com>, "'Andrew Larkins'" <Andrew.Larkins@bytes.co.za>,
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: New CCIE logo
> > Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:09:33 -0500
> >
> >
> > I agree... Where do sign up? We should start a online petition or
> > something. The CCIE logo absolutely should be different from the rest
> > of their cert's. The old one is more than adequate. If they want to
> > update it, then they should just introduce a cool colored version of the
> > B/W one. That way everything is preserved:
> >
> > Maintain Brand Recognition
> > Ten Year Achievement
> > Multiple Track Signification
> > Different that the lower certs
> > Updated logo (colored in addition to B/W) <-- for Cisco
> >
> > See... Everyone happy... (except, of course, for people that like the
> > new logo...)
> >
> > J
> >
> >
> >
> > Scott Morris wrote:
> > > They likely are. Or someone will forward it on. Whether it
> > > makes a difference or not is another story.
> > >
> > > Or whether it gets forwarded high enough up the chain, I'm not
> > > sure. There are a lot of things that can be changed in the world
> > > with grassroots movements... perhaps this could be one of them?
> > > :)
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: markom@gmail.com [mailto:markom@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> > > Marko Milivojevic
> > > Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 7:01 PM
> > > To: swm@emanon.com
> > > Cc: Scott Morris; Scott M Vermillion; Yandy Ramirez; Andrew
> > > Larkins; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: Re: New CCIE logo
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 23:47, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Just promise me you won't open up a cert support ticket about it! :)
> > >>
> > >
> > > Ah, you see! That's a bloody good idea! If I do that, the whole new
> > > thing may collapse and they may be forced to roll back.
> > >
> > > Btw. new logos, suck on so many levels. Did you notice that there is
> > > no vector version any longer? We're stuck with 3 sizes, which look
> > > disgusting at best when printed out. Not to mention that there is no
> > > official B&W version.
> > >
> > > What a sloppy work, I can't believe it. What the hell is wrong with
> > > what once was the greatest certification program? Sure, I hold some
> > > grudge about failing CCDE, but really, this is nonsense.
> > >
> > > And yeah, I hope they are reading.
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> >
>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Get your free email from http://www.hackermail.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:39 ARST