From: Piotr (usaccie@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jan 06 2009 - 21:21:26 ARST
My bad. I misread your email.
You an redistribute the loopback on R1.
Then use a distribute-list out.
int lo0
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
access-list 1 deny 1.1.1.0
access-list per any
route-map REDIST_LO0 per 10
match inter lo0
router ospf 1
redistribute connected subnets route-map REDIST_LO0
distribute-list 1 out
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com> wrote:
> Try this
>
> On R2
>
> ip prefix-list FILTERLSA3 seq 5 deny 111.111.111.0/24
> ip prefix-list FILTERLSA3 seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32
> router ospf 1
> area 1 range filter-list FILTERLSA3 in
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Sergei Udovenko <udovenko@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello to all CCIE candidates!
>> I've the following topology:
>>
>> lo:1.1.1.x->R1---R2----R3
>>
>> R1 - area 1
>> R2 - ABR
>> R3 - area 0
>>
>> The issue that I want that 1.1.1.x will not be advertised to the R2(ABR)
>> and
>> all other routers int area 0. So the problem here is that I want to find
>> workaround to filter route in intra- area and not on ABR with area 1 range
>> 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 not-advertise command. Also because there are about
>> 20
>> routers in area 0 that shouldn't receive 1.1.1.x and I don't want to
>> use distribute-list
>> x in on each router in area 0 to filter the local routing table on each
>> router.
>>
>>
>> May be some of you have any suggestion how to get this workaround?
>>
>> --------------------
>> Best regards,
>> Sergei
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:36 ARST