From: shiran guez (shiranp3@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Dec 17 2008 - 17:47:39 ARST
guys come on this is not the question if I can configure or if it is working
partialy or not.
The question is routing wise next hop my self is a valid next hop?! (no
router tricks)
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Luan Nguyen <luan@netcraftsmen.net> wrote:
> The command got accepted...with a warning...if your cisco router is the
> standby, then the VIP is not local, no complain there. And it works fine
> with debug ip policy.
>
> Luan Nguyen
> Chesapeake NetCraftsmen, LLC.
> www.NetCraftsmen.net <http://www.netcraftsmen.net/>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> shiran guez
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 12:57 PM
> To: Joseph Brunner
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: Need your Advice guys
>
> This is not the question, it is not my design or implementation or
> solution,
> the question is if it is a legal routing action or not and if it is a legal
> action (I think not, unless there is one of the other cases I have
> mentioned)!
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Joseph Brunner
> <joe@affirmedsystems.com>wrote:
>
> > I think it's a bad design all together and should be migrated away from
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > shiran guez
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 12:28 PM
> > To: Cisco certification
> > Subject: Need your Advice guys
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I am loosing my mind here with a scenario I have here:
> >
> >
> > CAT3750 have 3 vlans interfaces
> >
> > for example sake:
> >
> > # Incoming traffic from LAN
> > vlan 10
> > # Incoming traffic from WAN
> > vlan 20
> > # HSRP VLAN WITH Second Network Appliance
> > vlan 30
> >
> > on vlan 10 and 20 there is a PBR set based on match from source x to
> route
> > next hop HSRP virtual IP
> >
> > v10 v20
> > --------> CAT3750 <---------
> > ^
> > | v30
> > |
> > NETWORK Appliance
> > Now my argument is that as long as hsrp active status is the Network
> > Appliance there is no problem but when the Cat3750 will become active
> then
> > that mean that next hop is his own connected Interface and that is not a
> > legal routing action.
> >
> >
> > But why am I sending this out to the group?! well I got some SE's in my
> > company that are saying hey this is the way we work for several years now
> > and we have an official document that was issued to us ( by a former
> > employee in my company, note also a CCIE) that this should work.
> >
> > Well as long as I can remember this is not a legal routing action unless
> it
> > is pointing to a loopback interface where then I would use a PBR under
> the
> > global config to intercept local generated traffic and may be do a NAT or
> > some other stupid router tricks.
> >
> > Please correct me if I am loosing my mind here as sometime when several
> > people tell you something you start to loose your own confidence in your
> > knowledge.
> >
> >
> > Thank you all in advanced
> >
> > --
> > Shiran Guez
> > MCSE CCNP NCE1 JNCIA-ER CCIE #20572
> > http://cciep3.blogspot.com
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/cciep3
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Shiran Guez
> MCSE CCNP NCE1 JNCIA-ER CCIE #20572
> http://cciep3.blogspot.com
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/cciep3
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Shiran Guez MCSE CCNP NCE1 JNCIA-ER CCIE #20572 http://cciep3.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/cciep3Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:09 ARST