From: Jason Madsen (madsen.jason@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Dec 16 2008 - 02:58:29 ARST
Does the task specify which side of R2 traffic is supposed to have minimized
updates? If from the RIP side, unicasting updates in conjunction with
passive default sounds about right or using rip triggered as Piotr
mentioned. If from the OSPF side, you could consider something like ospf
flood reduction or demand circuit.
Jason
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 8:58 PM, John Edom <jedom123@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi,
>
> scanerio is like below, R1 and R2 are running RIP in a and vlan network is
> 192.168.1.0/24. R2 and R3 are running ospf in seperate vlan and net is
> 10.1.1.0/24.
>
> R1--------R2----------R3
>
> If question ask to minimize update traffic on R2 what it means ? We can
> you
> default passive and then no passive for interface that is connected with R1
> but since R2-R3 are on different network and i will configure command
> "network 192.168.1.0" so it will not send updates on other interface.
> There could be other solution that send update as unicast but i need your
> comments on it.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:08 ARST