From: antonygrooves (antonygrooves@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Dec 12 2008 - 10:51:55 ARST
I mean what if in the real lab ask me to configue RIP ipv6 over Frame
relay only in two routers not hub and sopoke.
Thats the question in the lab should i double map or just one.
Thanks again for the help.
Tony.
Pavel Bykov wrote:
> In the LAB I would not recommend it.
> One of the very first requirements and limitations in the lab:
> "Do not create any additional subnets, unless explicitly allowed"
>
> This is in ASET labs at least. So by providing addresses to ping,
> you'll break the rule
>
> You can always ping link local addresses on the link.
> Or you can check end-to-end connectivity
> Or you can check the routing protocol status.
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Rick Mur <rick@rickmur.com
> <mailto:rick@rickmur.com>> wrote:
>
> I'd say yes, because R1 and R2 wouldn't be able to ping each other
> across the link, so that breaks any 'full-reachability'
> requirement of your lab.
>
> Rick Mur
> CCIE #21946
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On 11 dec 2008, at 21:22, <antonygrooves@gmail.com
> <mailto:antonygrooves@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Do you still recommend to double map in frame relay between
> two routers, not a hub and spoke network. Only R1 ---- R2
>
> Thanks again.
>
>
> Tony.
>
> Pierre-Alex Guanel wrote:
>
> Yes, sure the maping at the Global level is needed for
> hub / spoke L3 reacheability , but not for IPv6 RIP....
>
> PA
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Rick Mur
> <rick@rickmur.com <mailto:rick@rickmur.com>
> <mailto:rick@rickmur.com <mailto:rick@rickmur.com>>> wrote:
>
> It's enough to only map the link-local in this case,
> although for
> my feeling
> I configure also a mapping to the global address. I
> guess it's just a
> feeling, but link-local is enough :)
>
>
> Rick Mur
> CCIE #21946 (R&S)
> CCNP, CCIP, JNCIA-ER, MCSE
> rick@rickmur.com <mailto:rick@rickmur.com>
> <mailto:rick@rickmur.com <mailto:rick@rickmur.com>>
>
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:59:13 -0200
> antonygrooves <antonygrooves@gmail.com
> <mailto:antonygrooves@gmail.com>
> <mailto:antonygrooves@gmail.com
> <mailto:antonygrooves@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> Hi Guys.
>
> I have a doubt regarding RIP IPV6 over Frame realy.
> If its necessary to do the frame relay map for the link
> local and
> link global, Like in OSPFV3 or just to the link local.
>
> In both cases y can see the routes behind the frame
> relay cloud,
> thats why im little confused.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Tony.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found
> at:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Pavel Bykov
> ----------------
> Don't forget to help stopping the braindumps, use of which reduces
> value of your certifications. Sign the petition at
> http://www.stopbraindumps.com/
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:08 ARST