From: gwood83@gmail.com
Date: Sun Dec 07 2008 - 23:21:51 ARST
Based upon the question which ultimately states a port has to wait 16seconds before moving into the forwarding state Jason is correct far as the configuration.
-----Original Message-----
Date: Sunday, December 07, 2008 4:56:57 pm
To: "TCP IP4" <tcp.ip4@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jason Madsen" <madsen.jason@gmail.com>, "Paul Adams" <ccie.paul@gmail.com>, "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
From: "Ali El Moussaoui" <mousawi.ali@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: MST / PVST
I still do not agree...blocking to learning is not a forwarding delay else
you will have to consider the same for PVST then either solutoin will be
correct but not both.
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 4:15 PM, TCP IP4 <tcp.ip4@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, 2 state changes are needed for MST. Jason is right.
>
> blocking -> learning: one forward-delay
> learning -> forwarding: two forward-delays
>
> Following is from a test switch with MST0 forward-delay set to 8 when port
> is unshut:
>
> *Mar 2 06:16:42.483: MST[0]: Gi1/0/5 state change disabled -> blocking
> *Mar 2 06:16:42.626: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/5,
> changed state to up
> *Mar 2 06:16:43.632: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
> GigabitEthernet1/0/5, changed state to up
> *Mar 2 06:16:50.486: MST[0]: Gi1/0/5 state change blocking -> learning
> *Mar 2 06:16:58.489: MST[0]: Gi1/0/5 state change learning -> forwarding
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Ali El Moussaoui <mousawi.ali@gmail.com>wrote:
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:08 ARST