From: Ali El Moussaoui (mousawi.ali@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Dec 08 2008 - 04:32:53 ARST
if thats true how u satisfy the question in the PVST case?
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 5:21 PM, gwood83@gmail.com <gwood83@gmail.com> wrote:
> Based upon the question which ultimately states a port has to wait
> 16seconds before moving into the forwarding state Jason is correct far as
> the configuration.
> -----Original Message-----
> Date: Sunday, December 07, 2008 4:56:57 pm
> To: "TCP IP4" <tcp.ip4@gmail.com>
> Cc: "Jason Madsen" <madsen.jason@gmail.com>, "Paul Adams" <
> ccie.paul@gmail.com>, "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> From: "Ali El Moussaoui" <mousawi.ali@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: MST / PVST
>
> I still do not agree...blocking to learning is not a forwarding delay else
> you will have to consider the same for PVST then either solutoin will be
> correct but not both.
>
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 4:15 PM, TCP IP4 <tcp.ip4@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > No, 2 state changes are needed for MST. Jason is right.
> >
> > blocking -> learning: one forward-delay
> > learning -> forwarding: two forward-delays
> >
> > Following is from a test switch with MST0 forward-delay set to 8 when
> port
> > is unshut:
> >
> > *Mar 2 06:16:42.483: MST[0]: Gi1/0/5 state change disabled -> blocking
> > *Mar 2 06:16:42.626: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/5,
> > changed state to up
> > *Mar 2 06:16:43.632: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
> > GigabitEthernet1/0/5, changed state to up
> > *Mar 2 06:16:50.486: MST[0]: Gi1/0/5 state change blocking -> learning
> > *Mar 2 06:16:58.489: MST[0]: Gi1/0/5 state change learning -> forwarding
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Ali El Moussaoui <mousawi.ali@gmail.com
> >wrote:
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:08 ARST