From: Lloyd Ardoin (Lloyd@TheWizKid.biz)
Date: Tue Dec 02 2008 - 13:34:34 ARST
I would agree with that.
Lloyd
From: Brandon S. Lynch
Sent: Tue 12/2/2008 9:27 AM
To: khurram noor; Lloyd Ardoin; Cisco certification
Subject: RE: OSPF without Virual Link
In my opinion, the answer to that question is determined by the task
itself (wording), and the goals and restrictions of the lab.
Again, just my opinion.
- Brandon
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
khurram noor
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:24 AM
To: Lloyd Ardoin; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: OSPF without Virual Link
By doing this the redistribution way, the routes from area 28 appears as
E2
routes in other areas ! is this ok.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Lloyd Ardoin <Lloyd@thewizkid.biz>
wrote:
> If you are going to use a tunnel the tunnel addresses have to be part
of
> area 0 for it to work correclty.
>
> Lloyd V Ardoin Network Engineer
> Sagenet, LLC
> 918-270-7133
> lardoin@sagenet.com
> MCSE, CCDA, CCNP, CCSP, GSEC, GCFW, GCWN, CISSP
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* khurram noor
> *Sent:* Tue 12/2/2008 9:15 AM
> *To:* Brandon S. Lynch; Cisco certification
> *Subject:* Re: OSPF without Virual Link
>
> what will the source and destination?
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Brandon S. Lynch <bsl@mnsginc.com>
wrote:
>
> > How about a tunnel?
> >
> > - Brandon
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> > khurram noor
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:07 AM
> > To: Cisco certification
> > Subject: OSPF without Virual Link
> >
> > I have a scenerio where i have 3 routers (R2, R4 and R5) and 1
switch
> > (SW2).
> > i have to configure ospf on them using area 0 , 245 and 28.
> >
> > R2, R4 and R5 are connected over frame-relay point to point.
> > R4 is connected R5 using serial link.
> > R2 eth is connected to SW2.
> >
> > Area 0 is configured on serial link b/w R4 and R5.
> > Area 245 is configured on frame-relay network of R2, R4 and R5.
> > Area 28 is configured on b/w eth link of R2 and SW2.
> >
> > Keeping the above scenerio is mind ... we need a virtual link for
area
> > 28
> > over area 245 to connect it to area 0....but the question demands
that
> > no
> > virutal link should be configured on R4 or R5.
> >
> > Can anyone help in solving this question.
> > I am doing Lab6 of IECWB.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Khurram Noor
> > CCIP, CCNA
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:07 ARST