Re: OSPF without Virual Link

From: khurram noor (smartcapricon82@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Dec 02 2008 - 13:34:28 ARST

I just dont understand why redisttibution was the solution to this problem.

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Brandon S. Lynch <bsl@mnsginc.com> wrote:

> In my opinion, the answer to that question is determined by the task
> itself (wording), and the goals and restrictions of the lab.
>
> Again, just my opinion.
>
> - Brandon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> khurram noor
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:24 AM
> To: Lloyd Ardoin; Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: OSPF without Virual Link
>
> By doing this the redistribution way, the routes from area 28 appears as
> E2
> routes in other areas ! is this ok.
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Lloyd Ardoin <Lloyd@thewizkid.biz>
> wrote:
>
> > If you are going to use a tunnel the tunnel addresses have to be part
> of
> > area 0 for it to work correclty.
> >
> > Lloyd V Ardoin Network Engineer
> > Sagenet, LLC
> > 918-270-7133
> > lardoin@sagenet.com
> > MCSE, CCDA, CCNP, CCSP, GSEC, GCFW, GCWN, CISSP
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* khurram noor
> > *Sent:* Tue 12/2/2008 9:15 AM
> > *To:* Brandon S. Lynch; Cisco certification
> > *Subject:* Re: OSPF without Virual Link
> >
> > what will the source and destination?
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Brandon S. Lynch <bsl@mnsginc.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > How about a tunnel?
> > >
> > > - Brandon
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > > khurram noor
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:07 AM
> > > To: Cisco certification
> > > Subject: OSPF without Virual Link
> > >
> > > I have a scenerio where i have 3 routers (R2, R4 and R5) and 1
> switch
> > > (SW2).
> > > i have to configure ospf on them using area 0 , 245 and 28.
> > >
> > > R2, R4 and R5 are connected over frame-relay point to point.
> > > R4 is connected R5 using serial link.
> > > R2 eth is connected to SW2.
> > >
> > > Area 0 is configured on serial link b/w R4 and R5.
> > > Area 245 is configured on frame-relay network of R2, R4 and R5.
> > > Area 28 is configured on b/w eth link of R2 and SW2.
> > >
> > > Keeping the above scenerio is mind ... we need a virtual link for
> area
> > > 28
> > > over area 245 to connect it to area 0....but the question demands
> that
> > > no
> > > virutal link should be configured on R4 or R5.
> > >
> > > Can anyone help in solving this question.
> > > I am doing Lab6 of IECWB.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Khurram Noor
> > > CCIP, CCNA
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Khurram Noor
> > CCIP, CCNA
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Khurram Noor
> CCIP, CCNA
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 

-- 
Khurram Noor
CCIP, CCNA

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:07 ARST