RE: OSPF without Virual Link

From: Brandon S. Lynch (bsl@mnsginc.com)
Date: Tue Dec 02 2008 - 13:18:34 ARST

The tunnel needs to be in area 0.....you can figure the rest out :-)

- Brandon

________________________________

From: khurram noor [mailto:smartcapricon82@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:16 AM
To: Brandon S. Lynch; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: OSPF without Virual Link

what will the source and destination?

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Brandon S. Lynch <bsl@mnsginc.com>
wrote:

How about a tunnel?

- Brandon

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
khurram noor
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:07 AM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: OSPF without Virual Link

I have a scenerio where i have 3 routers (R2, R4 and R5) and 1 switch
(SW2).
i have to configure ospf on them using area 0 , 245 and 28.

R2, R4 and R5 are connected over frame-relay point to point.
R4 is connected R5 using serial link.
R2 eth is connected to SW2.

Area 0 is configured on serial link b/w R4 and R5.
Area 245 is configured on frame-relay network of R2, R4 and R5.
Area 28 is configured on b/w eth link of R2 and SW2.

Keeping the above scenerio is mind ... we need a virtual link for area
28
over area 245 to connect it to area 0....but the question demands that
no
virutal link should be configured on R4 or R5.

Can anyone help in solving this question.
I am doing Lab6 of IECWB. 

--
Khurram Noor
CCIP, CCNA

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net <http://www.ccie.net/>

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:07 ARST