From: khurram noor (smartcapricon82@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Dec 02 2008 - 13:15:55 ARST
what will the source and destination?
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Brandon S. Lynch <bsl@mnsginc.com> wrote:
> How about a tunnel?
>
> - Brandon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> khurram noor
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:07 AM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: OSPF without Virual Link
>
> I have a scenerio where i have 3 routers (R2, R4 and R5) and 1 switch
> (SW2).
> i have to configure ospf on them using area 0 , 245 and 28.
>
> R2, R4 and R5 are connected over frame-relay point to point.
> R4 is connected R5 using serial link.
> R2 eth is connected to SW2.
>
> Area 0 is configured on serial link b/w R4 and R5.
> Area 245 is configured on frame-relay network of R2, R4 and R5.
> Area 28 is configured on b/w eth link of R2 and SW2.
>
> Keeping the above scenerio is mind ... we need a virtual link for area
> 28
> over area 245 to connect it to area 0....but the question demands that
> no
> virutal link should be configured on R4 or R5.
>
> Can anyone help in solving this question.
> I am doing Lab6 of IECWB.
>
>
> --
> Khurram Noor
> CCIP, CCNA
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Khurram Noor CCIP, CCNABlogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:07 ARST