From: Julian Pentermann (jpentermann@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Nov 27 2008 - 11:26:53 ARST
looks good to me...
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:19 AM, GAURAV MADAN <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have labbed this command . ALthough I have got this working also .....
> still wanted to confirm if my understanding is correct or not.
>
> R3----------R2---------R4
> area1 | area2
> |
> |
> |area 0
> R1
>
> R1 is originating 1.1.1.1 ; 2.2.2.2 ; 3.3.3.3 ; 4.4.4.4
>
> R2 has following prefix-list
> *********************
> do sh ip prefix-li
> ip prefix-list TEST: 3 entries
> seq 10 permit 1.1.1.1/32
> seq 20 permit 2.2.2.2/32
> seq 30 deny 0.0.0.0/0 le 32
>
> [A] If I say "area 1 filter-li TEST in "
> This means R3 will see 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2
>
> To achieve same thing ; I can also say :
>
> [B] "area 0 filter-list TEST out"
> Meaning thereby as routes go out of area 0 FILTER them acc to prefix-li
> This will cause R4 as well as R3 to see only 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2
>
> This is what I understood from this command .. PLease correct me if correct
> / wrong
>
> Thnx in advance
> Gaurav Madan.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2008 - 08:18:32 ARST