Re: RIP - Leaking into major networks

From: Hobbs (deadheadblues@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Nov 17 2008 - 14:21:56 ARST


If you need reachability to them, then I wouldn't filter them off. But
suppose the task said not to send RIP updates out of those interfaces. Then
it would be wise to use passive-interface on them.

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 4:25 AM, Nitro Drops <nitrodrops@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Say a router has 3 interfaces
>
> R1 E0/0 - 139.1.15.0/24
> R1 <http://139.1.15.0/24R1> E0/1 - 139.1.25.0/24
> R1 <http://139.1.25.0/24R1> S1/0 - 139.1.45.0/24
>
> Advertising R1 S1/0 (139.1.45.0/24) into RIP domain, both subnets
> 139.1.15.0/24 & 139.1.25.0/24 will leaked into the IGP domain.
>
> Is it a good practise to filter them off? A couple of times, i used a
> distribute-list to filter off, but at a later stage during the mutual
> distribution, i always didnt manage to get full reachability because of the
> distribute-list.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Time for change? Find your ideal job with SEEK.
>
> http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fninemsn%2Eseek%2Ecom%2Eau%2F%
>
> 3Ftracking%3Dsk%3Atl%3Ask%3Anine%3A0%3Ahottag%3Achange&_t=757263783&_r=SEEK_t
> agline&_m=EXT<http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fninemsn%2Eseek%2Ecom%2Eau%2F%3Ftracking%3Dsk%3Atl%3Ask%3Anine%3A0%3Ahottag%3Achange&_t=757263783&_r=SEEK_tagline&_m=EXT>
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2008 - 08:18:30 ARST