From: Raghav Bhargava (raghavbhargava12@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Nov 05 2008 - 02:26:50 ARST
Alright Experts,
here i go again
R1 is connected to R2 via FRame relay cloud on serial Interfaces. And
also there Ethernet interfaces are connected via a switch.
but my point is that when I advertise the ethernet Ip's which are on
different subnet i get that message which is correct coz the ip's are
on different subnet.
R2#
*Mar 30 17:22:39.531: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:100): Neighbor
200.1.1.1 not on common subnet for Ethernet1/0
*Mar 30 17:22:53.707: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:100): Neighbor
200.1.1.1 not on common subnet for Ethernet1/0
*Mar 30 17:23:07.991: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:100): Neighbor
200.1.1.1 not on common subnet for Ethernet1/0
*Mar 30 17:23:22.087: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:100): Neighbor
200.1.1.1 not on common subnet for Ethernet1/0
*Mar 30 17:23:35.491: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:100): Neighbor
200.1.1.1 not on common subnet for Ethernet1/0
*Mar 30 17:23:48.987: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:100): Neighbor
200.1.1.1 not on common subnet for Ethernet1/0
*Mar 30 17:24:02.867: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:100): Neighbor
200.1.1.1 not on common subnet for Ethernet1/0
*Mar 30 17:24:17.515: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:100): Neighbor
200.1.1.1 not on common subnet for Ethernet1/0
*Mar 30 17:24:31.907: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:100): Neighbor
200.1.1.1 not on common subnet for Ethernet1/0
*Mar 30 17:24:45.031: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:100): Neighbor
200.1.1.1 not on common subnet for Ethernet1/0
*Mar 30 17:24:59.371: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:100): Neighbor
200.1.1.1 not on common subnet for Ethernet1/0
*Mar 30 17:25:13.311: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:100): Neighbor
200.1.1.1 not on common subnet for Ethernet1/0
thanks
/raghav
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com> wrote:
> they are on the same subnet 131.1.12.1 and 131.1.12.2, right? the 200
> networks are the opposite ends...
>
> am i missing something? what is the actual physical topology? do you have
> these routers plugged into the same switch as well as connected via
> frame-relay?
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Raghav Bhargava <raghavbhargava12@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey buddy,
>>
>> This is from Narbik's Soup to nuts Lab6 Eigrp Stub. and I have
>> implemented it on my lab.
>>
>> here is the output on R1
>>
>>
>> R1#sh ip ro
>> Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
>> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
>> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
>> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
>> i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS
>> level-2
>> ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static
>> route
>> o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
>>
>> Gateway of last resort is not set
>>
>> 1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 4 subnets
>> C 1.1.0.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
>> C 1.1.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback1
>> C 1.1.2.0 is directly connected, Loopback2
>> C 1.1.3.0 is directly connected, Loopback3
>> D 2.0.0.0/8 [90/2297856] via 131.1.12.2, 00:53:51, Serial0/0.1
>> C 200.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet1/0
>> D 200.2.2.0/24 [90/2195456] via 131.1.12.2, 00:00:32, Serial0/0.1
>> 131.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>> C
>> *Mar 30 18:11:00.903: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:100): Neighbor
>> 200.2.2.2 not on common subnet for Ethernet1/0 131.1.12.0 is
>> directly connected, Serial0/0.1
>>
>>
>> thanks
>> /raghav
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Atlanta CCIE <atlantaccie@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Why don't you lab it up and let us all know?
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Raghav Bhargava
>> > <raghavbhargava12@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Expert,
>> >>
>> >> This is my topology :-
>> >>
>> >> R1------------------------FR--------------------------R2
>> >>
>> >> Now I have to run Eigrp and the Ip Addressing is as follows:-
>> >>
>> >> Fast ethernet on R1:- 200.1.1.1/24
>> >> Fast ethernet on R2:- 200.2.2.2/24
>> >>
>> >> My query is can the interfaces be on different subnets. If yes then
>> >> can someone explain how the EIGRP neighbor Adjacency will come up
>> >> ...???
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Warm Regards
>> >> Raghav
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Warm Regards
>> Raghav
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-- Warm Regards RaghavBlogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2008 - 08:18:29 ARST