From: Hobbs (deadheadblues@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Nov 05 2008 - 02:20:42 ARST
they are on the same subnet 131.1.12.1 and 131.1.12.2, right? the 200
networks are the opposite ends...
am i missing something? what is the actual physical topology? do you have
these routers plugged into the same switch as well as connected via
frame-relay?
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Raghav Bhargava
<raghavbhargava12@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hey buddy,
>
> This is from Narbik's Soup to nuts Lab6 Eigrp Stub. and I have
> implemented it on my lab.
>
> here is the output on R1
>
>
> R1#sh ip ro
> Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
> i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
> ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static
> route
> o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> 1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 4 subnets
> C 1.1.0.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
> C 1.1.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback1
> C 1.1.2.0 is directly connected, Loopback2
> C 1.1.3.0 is directly connected, Loopback3
> D 2.0.0.0/8 [90/2297856] via 131.1.12.2, 00:53:51, Serial0/0.1
> C 200.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet1/0
> D 200.2.2.0/24 [90/2195456] via 131.1.12.2, 00:00:32, Serial0/0.1
> 131.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> C
> *Mar 30 18:11:00.903: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:100): Neighbor
> 200.2.2.2 not on common subnet for Ethernet1/0 131.1.12.0 is
> directly connected, Serial0/0.1
>
>
> thanks
> /raghav
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Atlanta CCIE <atlantaccie@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Why don't you lab it up and let us all know?
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Raghav Bhargava
> > <raghavbhargava12@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Expert,
> >>
> >> This is my topology :-
> >>
> >> R1------------------------FR--------------------------R2
> >>
> >> Now I have to run Eigrp and the Ip Addressing is as follows:-
> >>
> >> Fast ethernet on R1:- 200.1.1.1/24
> >> Fast ethernet on R2:- 200.2.2.2/24
> >>
> >> My query is can the interfaces be on different subnets. If yes then
> >> can someone explain how the EIGRP neighbor Adjacency will come up
> >> ...???
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Warm Regards
> >> Raghav
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Warm Regards
> Raghav
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2008 - 08:18:29 ARST