From: Rob Clav (robclav@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Nov 02 2008 - 12:18:09 ARST
I see, in order to improve new route election when there's no FS after
a route fail, eigrp stub router is not queried, and also routers
behind it are not. So stub is like a eigrp boundary in fact, and never
mind if you are advertising routes or not, because it has other main
focus.
thank you Fahad and Pavel,
Roberto Clavero
2008/11/2 Pavel Bykov <slidersv@gmail.com>:
> Not entirely.
> Even in such a case, such router is never Queried, therefore you improve
> stability (as little as that maybe) and convergence time for routers without
> FS.
> Also remember, in R1---R2---R3 topology, if R2 is stub, it will not pass the
> updates from R1 to R3.
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Rob Clav <robclav@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> at some labs I find that eigrp stub router is for act like rip passive
>> interface behavior. But at the solutions it add most of the time
>> connected and summary.
>> I understant that connected is necessary if you have some networks
>> that you wish to advetise but summary I don't know which is the rule
>> to use it.
>> By other hand, if you are advertising connected areas, and summaries,
>> this router is working as regular eigrp nei, or not?
>> Thank you,
>> Roberto Clavero
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Pavel Bykov
> -------------------------------------------------
> Stop the braindumps!
> http://www.stopbraindumps.com/
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2008 - 08:18:28 ARST