EIGRP stub router

From: Rob Clav (robclav@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Nov 02 2008 - 10:21:19 ARST

Next message: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: non sure aboutt convergence time for spanning tree"
Previous message: Gary Duncanson: "Re: I have a PIX 515 that loss its clock upon report. And the"
Next in thread: Fahad Khan: "Re: EIGRP stub router"
Maybe reply: Fahad Khan: "Re: EIGRP stub router"
Maybe reply: Pavel Bykov: "Re: EIGRP stub router"
Maybe reply: Rob Clav: "Re: EIGRP stub router"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,
at some labs I find that eigrp stub router is for act like rip passive
interface behavior. But at the solutions it add most of the time
connected and summary.
I understant that connected is necessary if you have some networks
that you wish to advetise but summary I don't know which is the rule
to use it.
By other hand, if you are advertising connected areas, and summaries,
this router is working as regular eigrp nei, or not?
Thank you,
Roberto Clavero

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

Next message: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: non sure aboutt convergence time for spanning tree"
Previous message: Gary Duncanson: "Re: I have a PIX 515 that loss its clock upon report. And the"
Next in thread: Fahad Khan: "Re: EIGRP stub router"
Maybe reply: Fahad Khan: "Re: EIGRP stub router"
Maybe reply: Pavel Bykov: "Re: EIGRP stub router"
Maybe reply: Rob Clav: "Re: EIGRP stub router"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2008 - 08:18:28 ARST