Re: Help on OSPF DR/BDR in non-broadcast network type

From: Rob Clav (robclav@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Nov 01 2008 - 13:46:31 ARST


I had in mind lsa when typing hellos... :)

2008/11/1 Anthony Sequeira <asequeira@internetworkexpert.com>:
> But I do not think the big issue is with the Hello traffic. I believe it
> is with the LSA traffic.
>
> The main problems for OSPF with multi-access networks are:
>
> 1. The number of adjacencies that have to be maintained.
>
> 2. The flooding of LSAs. You would get unnecessary, redundant LSAs if you
> were not to use the DR/BDR in the NBMA network. A router would flood the
> LSA to all neighbors, and they would turn right around and do the same.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "TCP IP4" <tcp.ip4@gmail.com>
> Sent: Fri, October 31, 2008 16:58
> Subject:Help on OSPF DR/BDR in non-broadcast network type
>
> Hi Experts,
>
> Can someone please explain why we need DR/BDR election in the non-broadcast
> network type? If it's non-broadcast type the OSPF hellos aren't sent as
> often as the broadcast type. So the DR role is reduced compared to the
> DR's in the broadcast network.
>
> Thanks,
> -Tom
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- End of original message -----
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2008 - 08:18:28 ARST