From: Omkar Tambalkar (omkar.groupstudy@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Oct 20 2008 - 13:57:22 ARST
I learned one thing in this...dont assume anything. I thought the lab is
about authentication only then why would it ask about virtual links? I did
configure the virtual link to obtain connectivity and when cross-referencing
with the solutions, that was what was expected.
The wordings in this lab were; strongest which would be type 2, clear-text
which would be type 1.
- Later, Omkar
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Darby Weaver <ccie.weaver@gmail.com> wrote:
> So if you are asked to configure one of the following types of
> authentication, are you familiar with these?
>
> Type 0 or None or Null
>
> Type 1 or Weak or Text
>
> Type 2 or Strong or MD5
>
> Never know how something might be paraphrased these days.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Omkar,
>>
>> Will you be attending the B/C??
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Reza Toghraee <reza@toghraee.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Omkar,
>> >
>> > I think this task is teaching you how to use virtual-links. And you
>> > learned.
>> > There is no Typeo.
>> > Is you replace area 1 with 0 , it will be basic ospf ccna question.
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> > Omkar Tambalkar
>> > Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2008 3:27 AM
>> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> > Subject: Soup to Nuts OSPF Lab 2: Authentication question
>> >
>> > I am confused in OSPF lab 2 for Authentication.
>> >
>> > The way initial configuraton gets done, the ABR of area 2 is not
>> connected
>> > to area 0 directly but is connected to area 1. Area 1 has another ABR
>> that
>> > is connected to Area 0. Obviously other routers in area 2 cannot receive
>> > routes from areas except area 2 and vice versa unless virtual link is
>> > created by using area 1 as transit area.
>> >
>> > The task is to to ensure that all routers in the OSPF domain have
>> > reachability to the advertised networks in OSPF. Without specifics,
>> should
>> > I
>> > just configure the virtual link to obtain reachability or there is a
>> typo
>> > in
>> > describing initial configuration such that area 0 should really replace
>> > area
>> > 1 in the topology so that it is in the backbone?
>> >
>> > R1--------area 2------------R2
>> > |
>> > |
>> > area 1
>> > |
>> > |
>> > R4--------area 0------------R3
>> >
>> > - Later,
>> > Omkar
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Narbik Kocharians
>> CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
>> www.MicronicsTraining
>> www.Net-Workbooks.com <http://www.net-workbooks.com/>
>> Sr. Technical Instructor
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 01 2008 - 15:35:21 ARST