From: John (jgarrison1@austin.rr.com)
Date: Thu Oct 09 2008 - 17:49:54 ART
Funny, I remembered that, but it took me a couple of minutes to remember
192.168.0.0/16
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Sequeira" <asequeira@internetworkexpert.com>
To: "John" <jgarrison1@austin.rr.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: filter rfc 1918
> Source address is your concern here, unless the task has other goodies
> thrown in as well. So given that source address is the only concern, your
> standard list will do fine.
>
> One "gotcha" with this task is making sure you are blocking the correct
> range of 172.X.X.X networks.
>
> Anthony J. Sequeira, CCIE #15626, CCSI #23251
> Senior CCIE Instructor
>
> asequeira@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: jgarrison1@austin.rr.com
> Sent: Thu, October 9, 2008 12:47
> Subject:filter rfc 1918
>
> does it matter if I use an extende access-list with deny ip or a standard
> just
> denting the address's
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- End of original message -----
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 01 2008 - 15:35:20 ARST