Re: Repost : IP NBMA MODE Question

From: Hobbs (deadheadblues@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Oct 06 2008 - 01:04:08 ART


Nope, doesn't need it. Pim nbma mode would be needed if traffic needed to be
sent out the same interface it was received on (in sparse-mode), as is the
case with R5.

On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 9:49 PM, <mark.chandra@gmail.com> wrote:

> No, its on different serial hobbs.
>
> So, what do you think? It should use ip nbma node or not?
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry(R) wireless device from XL GPRS/EDGE/3G network
>
> ------------------------------
> *From*: Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>
> *Date*: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:42:40 -0600
> *To*: Mark Stephanus Chandra<mark.chandra@gmail.com>
> *CC*: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>
> *Subject*: Re: Repost : IP NBMA MODE Question
> hmm...sorry I should have asked about R3 connection to R5...is this on the
> same serial interface as the connections to R1/R2? If not, then pim nbma
> mode would not be needed
>
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Mark Stephanus Chandra <
> mark.chandra@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> No Hobss,
>>
>>
>>
>> R3 using serial Interface , no sub interface and it is a multipoint
>> interface.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>> *Mark Stephanus Chandra
>> *IT Consultant
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Hobbs [mailto:deadheadblues@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* 06 Oktober 2008 7:18
>> *To:* Mark Stephanus Chandra
>> *Cc:* ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> *Subject:* Re: Repost : IP NBMA MODE Question
>>
>>
>>
>> Is R3 using separate point-to-point sub-interfaces for connections to R1
>> and R2? That would be my first guess.
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Mark Stephanus Chandra <
>> mark.chandra@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Mark Stephanus Chandra [mailto:mark.chandra@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 05 Oktober 2008 13:42
>> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
>> Subject: IP NBMA MODE Question
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear GS,
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm coming on my lab 9 workbook, still confuse with multicast.
>>
>>
>>
>> So The question is like this
>>
>>
>>
>> Diagram :
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://s481.photobucket.com/albums/rr171/mark_chandra/?action=view¤t=M
>> CASTQST.jpg<http://s481.photobucket.com/albums/rr171/mark_chandra/?action=view¤t=MCASTQST.jpg>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The IEWB Workbook told to test a multicast group 224.1.1.1 connection
>> from
>> VLAN 7 to R4 and R5.
>>
>>
>>
>> So R4 and R5 ethernet is joining Group 224.1.1.1.
>>
>> And the solustion also use ip PIM NBMA-MODE on R5 Serial frame-relay
>> connection.
>>
>>
>>
>> The Question is, Why R3 connection to R1 and R2 doesn't have to use ip pim
>> nbma-mode ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Still confuse when to use Ip Pim NBMA-MOde,
>>
>>
>>
>> Please need you guys help on this.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks a lot
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Mark Stephanus Chandra
>>
>> IT-Network
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

-- 
Regards,

Hobbs uncertified @ReplyToTheEmail.com

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 01 2008 - 15:35:19 ARST