Re: frame-relay switching

From: Luca Hall (lhall@setnine.com)
Date: Thu Sep 25 2008 - 17:57:45 ART

• Next message: Ramy Sisy: "RE: CCIE Security Changes (Video)"
• Previous message: Hobbs: "Re: Can't remove traffic-shape group on Ethernet interface"
• Maybe in reply to: yungli2008@gmail.com: "frame-relay switching"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

the top way is old and the bottom way is new

----- Original Message -----
From: yungli2008@gmail.com
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:36:48 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: frame-relay switching

Hi experts
!
What is the difference between these two method of frame-relay switching?
!
!
frame-relay switching
!
interface Serial0/1
 encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay intf-type dce
frame-relay route 203 interface Serial0/2 302
!
interface Serial0/2
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay intf-type dce
 frame-relay route 302 interface Serial0/1 203

or

!
frame-relay switching
!
interface Serial0/1
 encapsulation frame-relay
 frame-relay intf-type dce
!
interface Serial0/2
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay intf-type dce
!
connect 1 serial 0/1 203 serial 0/2 302
!

Regards
Li

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

• Next message: Ramy Sisy: "RE: CCIE Security Changes (Video)"
• Previous message: Hobbs: "Re: Can't remove traffic-shape group on Ethernet interface"
• Maybe in reply to: yungli2008@gmail.com: "frame-relay switching"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:19 ART