From: Scott Morris (smorris@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Wed Sep 24 2008 - 09:39:17 ART
While it's possible for anything to be fair game, it's not the most likely
candidate.
Per interface hardware queuing on a switch (which is the largest chunk of
difference in 3550/3560 QoS) is not a focus area of the SP exam. The
technologies on switches that are focal areas are not drastically different
from 3550 to 3560.
Different rack rental companies will have different configurations as a
result.
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
Senior CCIE Instructor
smorris@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Outside US: 775-826-4344
Knowledge is power.
Power corrupts.
Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ovais.iqball@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 1:11 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: CCIE SP, switches confusion ?
Hi all, i have checked cisco site for SP lab equipment, it only mentions
3550 in switches, but i have seen different vendors using 3560 as well, why
?
One thing more, can some one guide me as to whether we shall expect Catalyst
QoS in SP like we do in R&S ? in lab blue print i dont see it but any
feedback pls ?
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:19 ART