Re: SNAT Behaviour

From: Fahad Khan (fahad.khan@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Sep 14 2008 - 04:22:19 ART

Next message: Huan Pham: "HELP - I locked myself after enabling aaa new-model ..."
Previous message: muhammad adnan: "Re: VTP question"
Maybe in reply to: S Malik: "SNAT Behaviour"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Dear Malik,

It does not happen normally, Can you plz share your configs.

regards,

On 9/13/08, S Malik <ccie.09@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> All,
> I have configured SNAT with HSRP, Router with higher priority is hsrp
> Active
> and peer recevies all the NAT entries. However, if the tracked interface
> goes down on active router and it becomes standby, then the new standby
> does
> not receive any nat entries from the new active router.
>
> Is it normal behaviour?
> If new standby becomes active again then it does not have any nat entries.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- Fahad Khan

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

Next message: Huan Pham: "HELP - I locked myself after enabling aaa new-model ..."
Previous message: muhammad adnan: "Re: VTP question"
Maybe in reply to: S Malik: "SNAT Behaviour"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:18 ART