From: Dale Kling (dalek77@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Sep 11 2008 - 20:20:58 ART
Yep, have to watch those tricky worded questions! :)
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Ali Mousawi <mousawi.ali@gmail.com> wrote:
> i agree for the 3 192 --> 223 but this is covering even subnets and hosts
> if the question was only classful subnets then it should be 192.0.0.0/3 ge
> 24 le 24
>
> what do u think?
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Dale Kling <dalek77@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 192.0.0.0/3 le 32
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Pavel Bykov <slidersv@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Valid yes, but it's basically bad.
>>> The proper way would be:
>>> ip prefix list CLASS_C permit 192.0.0.0/24
>>>
>>> by default prefix list without ge/le will match only what is written.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Ali Mousawi <mousawi.ali@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hello Folks,
>>> >
>>> > I want to match all Class C subnets using a prefix list would the
>>> following
>>> > be valid:
>>> >
>>> > ip prefix list CLASS_C permit 192.0.0.0/2 ge 24 le 24
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > Ali
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Pavel Bykov
>>> -------------------------------------------------
>>> Stop the braindumps!
>>> http://www.stopbraindumps.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:18 ART