From: Ahmed Elhoussiny (aelhoussiny@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Sep 10 2008 - 11:20:13 ART
Hello guys ,
Nortel is much powefull on L2 WAN Nodes/switches
(FR/ATM/X.25), ...thats my point of view
The Nortel DPN & Passports ( Magellan series) really
Rocks.
Ahmed Elhoussiny
CCIE R&S # 21988
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Gabriel Nunes <gabriel.nunes@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi cciestudy,
>
> Administrative distance has local importance, so no problem the vendor
> define the values, however, the EBGP should win of OSPF...
>
> Brgds,
>
> Gabriel Nunes
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:19 AM, cciestudy <cciestudy@mid-world.net>
> wrote:
>
> > I have had the "pleasure" of dealing with Nortel Voice equipment and
> > software and I was not impressed. Scary to say the least.
> >
> >
> >
> > One of my counterparts sent around a screen shot of a configuration
> screen
> > of Nortel 8600/8300 for setting routing "administrative distance". Here
> > are
> > the highlights of the screen shot.
> >
> >
> >
> > See anything wrong with this picture.
> >
> >
> >
> > RoutePref
> >
> > Protocol Default Configured
> >
> >
> >
> > Local 0 0
> >
> > Static 5 5
> >
> > ospfIntra 20 20
> >
> > ospfInter 25 25
> >
> > ebgp 45 45
> >
> > rip 100 100
> >
> > ospfExternal1 120 120
> >
> > ospfExternal2 125 125
> >
> > ibgp 175 175
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Bill
> > Eyer
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 5:49 PM
> > To: Brad Ellis
> > Cc: Cisco certification
> > Subject: Re: OT: Cisco vs. Nortel
> >
> >
> >
> > Nortel's core business is voice and they stick to it pretty well. For
> >
> > routing/switching their history isn't so good. They bought out a pretty
> >
> > nice company in Bay Networks, then put nothing into Rnd, fell way
> >
> > behind, then bought Tasmin to try and get back in the game. How do we
> >
> > know they won't do the same thing again. Their big money is in carrier
> >
> > phone switches. We used to be all Nortel, now are all Cisco and happier
> >
> > for it.
> >
> >
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> >
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> >
> > Brad Ellis wrote:
> >
> > > Have you guys seen this?
> >
> > >
> >
> > > http://blip.tv/file/1233122
> >
> > >
> >
> > > It's about Nortel's claim that they are more "energy efficient" than
> >
> > > Cisco.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Isn't this kind of like comparing a Ferrari to a Ford Escort? Anyone
> >
> > > else have any thoughts on this? I'm not that familiar with Nortel.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > thanks,
> >
> > > Brad Ellis
> >
> > > CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security)
> >
> > > CCSI# 30482
> >
> > > CEO / President
> >
> > > CCBOOTCAMP - A Cisco Sponsored Organization (SO)
> >
> > > Email: brad@ccbootcamp.com
> >
> > > Toll Free: 877-654-2243
> >
> > > International: +1-702-968-5100
> >
> > > Toronto, Canada: +1-416-238-0441
> >
> > > Skype: skype:ccbootcamp?call
> >
> > > FAX: +1-702-446-8012
> >
> > > YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
> >
> > > Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > >
> >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> >
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> >
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> >
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:17 ART