From: Michael Permoda (mpermoda@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Sep 09 2008 - 10:17:25 ART
thanks for the feedback. That's what I thought. What got me confused is that there is still ones out there saying it is not needed....
----------------------------------------
> From: mpermoda@hotmail.com
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: ip pim rp-address
> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 00:32:34 -0400
>
> All,
>
> I know this is an old topic but I have been seeing different opinions from
> different vendors. When configuring sparse mode only and using static RPs do
> we have to configure the ip pim rp-address on the RP itself or no? From my own
> experience it is good practice do configure it and I am actually testing it
> right now and it doesn't work without it. I get "Received Register from
> router 129.1.46.6 for group 232.32.32.32, 150.1.0.255 not willing to be RP".
> After I configure the ip pim rp-address command on the RP, all works. However,
> I have gotten feedback from Cisco that it is not needed. Could anyone clarify
> this please? Thanks, Mike P.
> _________________________________________________________________
> Want to do more with Windows Live? Learn 10 hidden secrets from Jamie.
> http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!550
> F681DAD532637!5295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_domore_092008
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:17 ART