ip pim rp-address

From: Michael Permoda (mpermoda@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Sep 09 2008 - 01:32:34 ART

Next message: Marc La Porte: "Re: Need some information at Belgium Location!"
Previous message: Chidd: "Need some information at Belgium Location!"
Next in thread: femi ogunlana: "Re: ip pim rp-address"
Maybe reply: femi ogunlana: "Re: ip pim rp-address"
Maybe reply: Bill Eyer: "Re: ip pim rp-address"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: ip pim rp-address"
Maybe reply: Michael Permoda: "RE: ip pim rp-address"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

All,

I know this is an old topic but I have been seeing different opinions from
different vendors. When configuring sparse mode only and using static RPs do
we have to configure the ip pim rp-address on the RP itself or no? From my own
experience it is good practice do configure it and I am actually testing it
right now and it doesn't work without it. I get "Received Register from
router 129.1.46.6 for group 232.32.32.32, 150.1.0.255 not willing to be RP".
After I configure the ip pim rp-address command on the RP, all works. However,
I have gotten feedback from Cisco that it is not needed. Could anyone clarify
this please? Thanks, Mike P.

Next message: Marc La Porte: "Re: Need some information at Belgium Location!"
Previous message: Chidd: "Need some information at Belgium Location!"
Next in thread: femi ogunlana: "Re: ip pim rp-address"
Maybe reply: femi ogunlana: "Re: ip pim rp-address"
Maybe reply: Bill Eyer: "Re: ip pim rp-address"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: ip pim rp-address"
Maybe reply: Michael Permoda: "RE: ip pim rp-address"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:17 ART