From: Roger RPF (rpf@bluemail.ch)
Date: Wed Sep 03 2008 - 18:59:08 ART
O.k, that reason is obvious. I was thinking there might be another
technical restriction.
Thanks
Roger
Von: Igor M. [mailto:imanassypov@rogers.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. September 2008 23:36
An: ccielab@groupstudy.com; Roger RPF
Betreff: Re: BSR question
One bsr is sufficient, but you want to use a couple for redundancy/load
balancing purposes.
----------------------
I.M., M.Eng. P.Eng.
Network Architect
CI Investments
----------------------
--- On Wed, 9/3/08, Roger RPF <rpf@bluemail.ch> wrote:
From: Roger RPF <rpf@bluemail.ch>
Subject: BSR question
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Received: Wednesday, September 3, 2008, 5:24 PM
Hi Group,
Question regarding BSR. If I have a network with a couple of c-RP's, do i
have to configure every c-RP also as a c-BSR? I was thinking that It
perfectly runs if I have only one c-BSR but after reading the DocCD which
says: "perform tis step (ip pim bsr-candidate) on the RP and BSR
routers"
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipmulti/configuration/guide/imc_basic_cf
g_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1054362
Is there are reason to do that? After my experience in labbing it up it
works just fine with one c-BSR...but maybe I
forgot something....
thanks
Roger
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:17 ART