Re: Eigrp -stub config.

From: ehiwe peter (ccie.in.nigeria@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Sep 01 2008 - 18:14:01 ART


I suggest advertising a default route to BB at Ra for routes received from Rb

On 9/1/08, ashhy <mail4hafiz@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all
> I have query abt Eigrp stub.
>
> The scenario is like this ,
> If I have Ra router connected to BB and Rb over Ethernet segment
> As shown
>
> Eigrp 10 { (Rb)--------|---------(Ra)----------|----------(BB) }
>
> From BB I am receiving routes.
>
> But I donb t want to send topology changes to BB but only receive the routes
> from BB .
>
> In this scenario if I use eigrp 10 stub at Ra then I will not be a transit
> for
> BB from Rb
> And if I use passive interface it we kill the neighbor-ship .
> And if I use a distribute list at Ra and call a prefix-list deny any then
> still I will be informing the topology changes to BB . What best could
> solve
> this issue.
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong and suggest a better solution
>
> Thanks
> Ashhy
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:17 ART