From: Hobbs (deadheadblues@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Sep 01 2008 - 19:54:07 ART
As far as i know:
stubs prevent querying.
summarizing prevents propogating topology changes.
I don't think stub is your answer. I think summarizing at RA or RB is.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 3:14 PM, ehiwe peter <ccie.in.nigeria@gmail.com>wrote:
> I suggest advertising a default route to BB at Ra for routes received from
> Rb
>
> On 9/1/08, ashhy <mail4hafiz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all
> > I have query abt Eigrp stub.
> >
> > The scenario is like this ,
> > If I have Ra router connected to BB and Rb over Ethernet segment
> > As shown
> >
> > Eigrp 10 { (Rb)--------|---------(Ra)----------|----------(BB) }
> >
> > From BB I am receiving routes.
> >
> > But I donb t want to send topology changes to BB but only receive the
> routes
> > from BB .
> >
> > In this scenario if I use eigrp 10 stub at Ra then I will not be a
> transit
> > for
> > BB from Rb
> > And if I use passive interface it we kill the neighbor-ship .
> > And if I use a distribute list at Ra and call a prefix-list deny any
> then
> > still I will be informing the topology changes to BB . What best could
> > solve
> > this issue.
> >
> > Please correct me if I am wrong and suggest a better solution
> >
> > Thanks
> > Ashhy
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:17 ART