From: paul cosgrove (paul.cosgrove@heanet.ie)
Date: Fri Aug 29 2008 - 04:38:07 ART
IS-IS is used a lot in SPs, one reasons is that you can exchange IPv4
and IPv6 routes using the same process.
In the past I think some of the optimisation features (timer tweaks
etc.) have been available in IS-IS before OSPF.
People tend to me more familiar with OSPF though.
Paul.
darth router wrote:
> in SP networks, which is better, and why?
>
> How prevalent is IS-IS in the real world?
>
> Is there a large chance that it will shrink and go away?
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:33 ART