From: davidytk (davidytk@netvigator.com)
Date: Tue Aug 19 2008 - 11:58:06 ART
Hi Jason
Try using switchport trunk nonegotiate.
Best Regards
David
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Jason Kline
Sent: 2008-08-19 21:22
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: workbook lab question on trunking
I was posed with a question on a workbook mock lab and noticed that I was
incorrect on my answer however achieved the desired results. The question
was worded build trunks among all 4 switches (3550 and 3560) using ISL, do
NOT negotiate trunk links and build ether channel links that are also NOT
negotiable. For the trunk links I used static trunking with ISL as the
tagging protocol. For the ether channels I used ether channel only, not
PAGP or LACP. I think my answers where correct and however it seems that I
am not. Please let me know what wording I should be aware of to properly
configure a task in a workbook lab.
Regards,
Jason Kline
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:31 ART